|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
|
My research program concerns the evolutionary morphology of the mammalian skull and masticatory apparatus, focusing in particular on major adaptive transformations across and within higher-level clades. To this end, I employ comparative, ontogenetic and experimental analyses so as to increase our empirical and theoretical understanding of the biomechanical, ecological, developmental and allometric influences on important craniomandibular character states and character complexes. Given the importance of transverse mandibular and occlusal
forces in the evolution of anthropoid symphyseal fusion, we recently analyzed
the relations among occlusal orientation, jaw kinematics and symphyseal
fusion in selenodont artiodactyls.
Related analyses of symphyseal fusion and the scaling of jaw
proportions in living and fossil carnivorans, as well as marsupials, indicate
an emerging pattern common to a variety of mammalian clades whereby
larger-bodied sister taxa show increased fusion and greater mandibular
cross-sectional robusticity due to an emphasis on more ductile and/or brittle
foods. Another project focuses on the
ontogenetic and interspecific patterning of orbital orientation in
strepsirhine and anthropoid primates.
Such an approach is vital as hypotheses about size and scaling are
inherently concerned with ontogenetic patterns of structural covariation and
how such intrinsic relations are expressed across taxa, i.e., what limits or
directs the occupation of morphospace.
In doing so, it tests an influential model regarding the functional
link between increased orbital convergence and orbital frontation and the
evolution of the anthropoid postorbital septum, a feature unique among all
vertebrates. Additional
research tests a longstanding hypothesis that a nocturnal visual predation
strategy and relatively larger brains in basal euprimates required more
anteriorly and vertically positioned orbits, and this is related to the
derived presence of the euprimate postorbital bar. By coupling paleontological and
neontological evidence from mammalian analogs with in vivo bone strain from
the circumorbital region and evaluating this evidence allometrically, we
identified a suite of functional and structural factors unique to small skull
sizes that characterize basal euprimates.
Such evidence is critical for emphasizing the role of encephalization
on circumorbital form and for revising our knowledge of euprimate origins. Ongoing
comparative work on lemurs and slow lorises shows that, while variation in
skull form between larger and smaller sister taxa is due to the differential
extension of shared growth allometries, such ontogenetic scaling may not characterize
the mandible due to taxic variation in dietary properties. Although indriid skull proportions are
ontogenetically scaled, jaw-adductor in-lever arms in the smallest genus (Avahi) differ from other taxa. This is linked to the positive scaling of
in-lever arm length during indriid cranial growth, such that in-lever
proportions for avahis are uncoupled from this ancestral pattern to
facilitate the production of comparable bite forces at small sizes (necessary
for a clade-wide emphasis on folivory).
These findings highlight why one should assess the functional basis of
allometric patterns in phyletic size variants as well as the adaptive basis
for the lack of allometric concordance in a feature. Collaborative
research on Malagasy sifakas offers a rare example where body-size
differentiation and heterochronic changes can be linked to ecogeographic
factors. Propithecus diadema develops larger adult size primarily by
growing at a faster rate, but not for a longer duration, than P. tattersalli and P. verreauxi. On one hand, the less-seasonal rainforest
environs of P. diadema impose
greater selective pressures for larger size than the dry-forest or semi-arid
climates of its two sister taxa. On
the other, as smaller sifakas are located in the east, west and northeast,
this implies that adult size is set by dry-season constraints on food quality
and distribution. That ontogenetic
scaling occurs via differences in growth rate also appears related to
ecogeographic variation in resource seasonality and juvenile mortality risk. Recently hosted the
first international conference on Primate Origins and Adaptations.
Science (295, 613-615) : New Fossils and a Glimpse of Evolution Ravosa, M.J. & Savakova, D.G. (2003)
Euprimate origins: The eyes have it. Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences, USA in press. Ravosa, M.J.
& Hogue, A.S. (2003) Function and fusion of the mandibular symphysis in
mammals: A comparative and experimental perspective. In C.F. Ross & R.F.
Kay (Eds.): Anthropoid Evolution. New Directions. Ravosa, M.J.,
Savakova, D.G., Noble, V.E., Johnson, K.R. & Hylander, W.L. (2003)
Primate origins and the function of the circumorbital region: What’s load got
to do with it? In M.J. Ravosa & M. Dagosto (Eds.): Primate Origins and
Adaptations. Ravosa, M.J.
& Vinyard, C.J. (2002) On the interface between ontogeny and function. In
J.M. Plavcan, R.F. Kay, W.L. Jungers & C.P. van Schaik (Eds.):
Reconstructing Behavior in the Primate Fossil Record. Hogue,
A.S. & Ravosa, M.J. (2001) Transverse masticatory movements,
occlusal orientation, and symphyseal fusion in selenodont artiodactyls.
Journal of Morphology 249:221-241. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|